Audible playback of ultrasound using GNURadio Companion
Inspired by the preamp and hydrophone post yesterday by Mikko Syrjäsuo, I put together some gnuradio scripts for processing infra or ultrasound recordings. There are three different flowgraphs: The first one allows you to playback a recording with a faster or slower speed. The second one allows you to shift signal in frequency by multiplying it with a complex sinusoid up or down in frequency to an audible band. The third one is something similar to what Mikko was describing. It uses a custom python block to compress a wide bandwidth into a more narrow bandwidth by using something called a vocoder (at least that is what I think it is called). I've attached the code.
The audio downconversion script and the vocoder script can also be operated in realtime, by replacing the wav-source block with an audio card block. It sounds very weird talking to a microphone and hearing your own voice shifted to a higher or lower frequency.
For more serious applications, you could also use the USRP N2x0 or USRP1 together with the LFRX daughterboard to record ultrasound signals.
I managed to find nice high frequency (250 kHz) ultrasound recordings of bat sounds on this web site: http://www.batcalls.com/. I have used these for testing. Specifically this wav file.
|Flowgraph to adjust the speed of the audio recording, resulting in sped up or slowed down playback of the wav file.|
|Audio frequency shifting using mixing and filtering. This allows "mixing" the ultrasound onto an audible frequency band, retaining the temporal characteristics of the signal.|
|View of the downconversion gnuradio program in action when listening to a bat recording. Above: audible 0..22.05 kHz waterwall spectrum of the downconverted audio, Below: the 0..125 kHz ultrasound recording.|
|The vocoder flowgraph. The vocode block is a custom block that I wrote in Python. The code is shown below.|
|Bat call signal between 10 and 75 kHz is converted into a 1 to 14 kHz signal.|
The code for the vocoder is shown below:
#Simple vocoder gnuradio block, (c) 2017 Juha Vierinen
import numpy as np from gnuradio import gr class vocode(gr.sync_block): """ docstring for block vocode """ def __init__(self, n,n0,n1,dec): self.buflen=4*n+8192 self.tmp_in = np.zeros(self.buflen,dtype=np.float32) # buffering self.tmp_out = np.zeros(self.buflen,dtype=np.float32)# buffering
self.fin = np.zeros(n,dtype=np.float32) self.n = n # fft size self.n0 = n0 # first bin (mapped to dc freq) self.n1 = n1 # last bin (mapped to dc+(n1-n0) freq) self.w=np.zeros(n,dtype=np.float32) # window function l2=int(n/2) self.w[0:l2]=np.linspace(0,1.0,num=l2) self.w[l2:n]=np.linspace(1.0,0.0,num=l2)
# how much do we integrate and decimate spectral components toghether self.dec = dec
# some buffer indices self.idx_bufin = 0 # location on input buffer self.idx_proc = 0 # location on processing buffer self.idx_out = 0 # location on output buffer gr.sync_block.__init__(self, name="vocode", in_sig=[np.float32], out_sig=[np.float32]) def work(self, input_items, output_items): in0 = input_items out = output_items L=len(in0)
# insert data into input buffer self.tmp_in[np.mod(self.idx_bufin+np.arange(L),self.buflen)]=in0
# number of windows we can process
n_win = int(np.floor((tail-self.n-self.idx_proc)/(self.n/2)))
tail = self.idx_bufin+L
# process all available FFT windows (half overlapping) for i in range(n_win): # window i0=self.idx_proc fin=self.tmp_in[np.mod(i0+np.arange(self.n),self.buflen)] # compress and shift spectrum F=np.fft.rfft(self.w*fin) Fc=np.convolve(F,np.repeat(1.0/float(self.dec),self.dec),mode="same") idxs=np.arange(self.n0,self.n1,self.dec) Fc2=np.copy(F) ; Fc2[:]=0.0 Fc2[np.arange(len(idxs))]=Fc[idxs] self.tmp_out[np.mod(i0+2*self.n+np.arange(self.n),self.buflen)]+=self.w*np.fft.irfft(Fc2) # empty tail of buffer self.tmp_out[np.mod(i0-self.n+np.arange(self.n),self.buflen)]=0.0 self.idx_proc+=self.n/2
self.idx_bufin+=L out[:]=self.tmp_out[np.mod(self.idx_out+np.arange(L),self.buflen)] self.idx_out+=L return L
You have posted such a good post. I am very impressed by your work towards your post for sharing such useful information. Thank you.ultrasound PerthReplyDelete
fake pregnancy ultrasound I think this is an informative post and it is very useful and knowledgeable. therefore, I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article.ReplyDelete
you give great information for blogger, I learn new information from your article, you are doing a great job. thanks for sharing, keep it up. portable handheld ultrasoundReplyDelete